As AI adoption accelerates across the software development lifecycle, so too do concerns about the security of applications built with — and powered by — large language models and autonomous agents. At Black Hat USA 2025, these concerns are being addressed more directly than in prior years, with OWASP’s GenAI Security Project now playing a central role in defining how the cybersecurity industry approaches risk in AI-enabled applications.Together, these materials aim to give application security and DevSecOps teams a roadmap for integrating AI into secure development practices. OWASP is also hosting a dedicated GenAI Security Briefing + Beer event on August 9 for in-person discussion and networking.Related: OWASP Unpacks GenAI Security’s Biggest Risks to LLMsThese sessions, while not branded as OWASP-led, reflect many of the concerns captured in the GenAI Security Project’s guidance — including the challenges of securing data pipelines, ensuring provenance in model inputs and outputs, and designing for interpretability and auditability.Related: Why AI Breaks the Traditional Security Stack—and How to Fix It
OWASP’s GenAI Security Project comes into focus
OWASP formally elevated its GenAI Security Project to flagship status earlier this year, and the group is using Black Hat as a platform to showcase its most recent outputs. These include:- The OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications, which identifies key vulnerabilities such as prompt injection, insecure plugin design, and over-permissive model behaviors.
- A Guide to Securing Agentic Applications, released in late July, focused on AI agents that operate autonomously or as part of multi-agent workflows.
- A growing body of reference tools, including a Threat & Mitigation Taxonomy and Data Security Best Practices.
AI AppSec themes broaden in the Black Hat agenda
While OWASP’s contributions are technically community-led, their influence is increasingly visible in the broader Black Hat program. Several sessions in the conference’s AI Summit touch on application-layer risks related to AI adoption, including:- “Debunking AI Myths & Misconceptions” – which includes discussion of inflated vendor claims and the gap between AI capabilities and security realities.
- “Building an Anti-Fragile Security Operations Program in the AI Era” – focused in part on how AI-generated telemetry and actions can complicate attack detection and response.
- “Can Enterprises Build Their Own AI SOC?” – an exploration of autonomous security tooling and its implications for governance and control.





