Government Regulations, Security Staff Acquisition & Development, Leadership
Cyber brain drain from Congress continues as Langevin, Katko announce departures

U.S. Rep. Jim Langevin, D-R.I., testifies during a hearing before the Energy and Power Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee on May 31, 2011, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Langevin and Republican John Katko, R-N.Y., are among a number of cyber-focused lawmakers who have left Congress in recent years. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Congress will lose a substantial chunk of its cyber expertise as multiple members with backgrounds in digital security policy are leaving ahead of the 2022 mid-term elections.On Tuesday, Rep. Jim Langevin, D-R.I., announced he would not be running for reelection this year.“Like I promised when I first ran for office, I have done my best to stand up for you and your families. But after serving the people of Rhode Island for over 3 decades — including 11 terms and nearly 22 years in Congress — today, I am announcing that I will not be a candidate for elected office this November,” Langevin wrote Tuesday in an op-ed in the Rhode Island Providence Journal.Langevin’s congressional career has been marked by a keen interest in cybersecurity policy well before it became a hot-button issue in the federal government. He is a co-founder of the Congressional Cybersecurity Caucus, chairs the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Cyber, Innovative Technologies and Information Systems and also sits on the House Homeland Security Committee, which has oversight jurisdiction for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Langevin was among the first lawmakers to make the case for transforming the National Protection and Programs Directorate — an obscure component with the Department of Homeland Security with little in the way of budget or resources — into what eventually became CISA. He has used his committee assignments to consistently stump for CISA and U.S. Cyber Command to receive additional funding and resources to meet the increased threat from nation-state and criminal hacking groups that target the U.S.He also served as a commissioner for the Cyberspace Solarium Commission, and helped usher dozens of bills based on their recommendations through Congress, including the establishment of a national cyber director, empowering CISA to conduct proactive threat hunting on federal networks, establishing “nerve centers” to improve public and private collaboration on cybersecurity threats and many others.One piece of unfinished business he will leave regards the way Congress debates and legislates around cybersecurity. Langevin has long been a critic of the way the issue is dispersed across Congress, telling this reporter in 2019 that at anywhere between 80 to 100 committees and subcommittees in Congress claim some ownership over the issue. That kind of jurisdictional sprawl makes it nearly impossible to move significant or even slightly controversial legislation around cybersecurity, and inhibits the ability of Congress to update laws and procedures in a timely fashion, and Langevin and others have sought to streamline which committees have ownership over the issue.Outside of Congress, he has engendered deep respect within the cybersecurity community, attending and giving talks at popular hacker conferences like DEF CON and championing the legal right of security researchers to probe commercial products for vulnerabilities.
Get daily email updates
SC Media's daily must-read of the most current and pressing daily news
You can skip this ad in 5 seconds