Despite claims by voting
machine makers and election officials that election systems are immune to hackers
because they’re not connected to the internet, the Election Systems &
Software voting systems in 10 states, some of them swing states, were found to
be just that – connected, a team of security researchers found.Systems from the U.S.’s top voting machine vendor, some hooked to the internet for a year or more, can be found in counties in swing states Florida, Michigan and Wisconsin as well as in other states, according to a report from Motherboard.“We ... discovered
that at least some jurisdictions were not aware that their systems were
online,” the report cited one of the 10 security researchers, Kevin Skoglund, as
saying.But ES&S Vice
President of Software Development and Engineering Gary Weber dismissed
concerns. “There’s nothing connected to the firewall that is exposed to the
internet,” Weber told Motherboard, noting that the company’s election-management
system “is not pingable or addressable from the public internet” so users and
bad actors can’t see them.Skoglund apparently took
issue with that claim, saying that if hackers discover the firewall, they can
find the connected systems.“It is not
air-gapped. The EMS is connected to the internet but is behind a firewall,” he
is quoted as saying, explaining the firewall “is the only thing that segments
the EMS from the internet.”Tim Mackey, principal
security strategist CyRC at Synopsis, warned that since “misconfiguration of systems is common in
environments ranging from home users to large enterprises” and IT resources at
the state and local levels are notoriously tight, “it’s not overly surprising
to find misconfiguration in electronic voting systems.”But “what is worrisome are assertions made by officials
regarding how those voting systems operate in their respective districts and
what that means for the overall level of IT governance applied to them,” said
Mackey. “A report indicating voting systems are connected to state elections
networks over any form of unsecured public network should cause a full review
in any state using electronic voting machines from any vendor.”Motivated actors could “just as easily intercept network traffic
from a wireline modem as via a WiFi access point and connections made over the
public internet reduces the complexity of remote attacks,” he said, urging
election officials to take action.“In light of this report, election officials should launch a
review of all computing, network and storage systems used in the electoral
process. As part of that review, a detailed audit of current configuration vs.
expected configuration should be performed,” said Mackey. “The configuration
data should include not only traditional configuration options, but also the
patch state for all software regardless of source, and an analysis for all
firmware and applications to ensure they don’t embed vulnerable components or
have “phone home” mechanisms which could transmit data to third parties.”
Get daily email updates
SC Media's daily must-read of the most current and pressing daily news
You can skip this ad in 5 seconds
